透過案例式學習方法培養學生主動學習

什麼是案例式學習?

案例式學習是「一個發展成熟、跨學科的教學法,當中學生把知識應用於現實的情況,從而提高認知水平」(The Yale Center for Teaching and Learning)(譯本:教學中心;原文請參考英文版本)。案例式學習深信學生可以利用他們的已有知識打造學習,這也反映了建構主義所主張的學說-最有效吸收知識的方法是通過探究和主動學習。因此,這種方法被認為是一種以學生為中心的主動學習策略。在一個典型的案例式學習課堂上,學生以個案研究的形式進行小組討論,並實踐所學,包括批判性思維和解決問題的能力。教師作為促導者,在推動個案討論、敦促學生學習,鼓勵他們分析和評估他們表現這些方面都發揮著關鍵的作用。 

什麼是案例?

一個案例能講述既真實又令人感興趣的故事,並帶出令人深思的問題。一個案例通常具有相矛盾的元素,卻沒有一個標準答案。清楚這些案例的特點後,你可能會問:「我們從何搜集案例呢?」其實現實世界中的問題,例如本地或國際性的新聞,都是案例的好素材。由學生發掘的問題也可以用作個案討論,令他們產生更大共鳴。 

為什麼選擇案例式學習?

案例式學習對學生的裨益深得認同。精於以案例教學並獲得多個獎項的社會學教授John Foran(2001)認為,在課堂上使用案例式學習的目的是「培養學生批判性思維,通過決策和角色扮演的情境學習;透過互動討論建立學生對介定、正視、分析和解決問題的信心;以及鍛煉學生在公開演講的技巧(譯本:教學中心;原文請參考英文版本)。」學生之所以積極參與個案討論,是因為大多數的案例均取材自現實生活,令教學內容與學生息息相關。 

如何在你的課堂上進行案例式學習?

讓我舉個例子,看看文化研究課堂如何運用案例式學習。教師可以利用最近一宗有關英國曼徹斯特美術館審查維多利亞時代的一幅巨作的爭議性新聞報導作為案例,讓學生討論視覺文化中的性別和女性主義問題。首先,把學生分成小組,並用批判性思維來討論這個問題。這以學生為中心的討論讓學生在研究個案的同時,可以整合已學的概念或跨學科的知識。教師通過「為什麼」、「為什麼不能」、「如何」和「假如」等高層次思維問題引導小組討論。教師不應在此講課或主導討論,反而應鼓勵學生積極參與自己的學習。一個成功的個案討論可以將當天的議論成果與已有知識聯繫起來,並為往後的學習奠定基礎。 

案例式學習是一個吸引學生參與的方法,也為學生運用批判性思維,建構知識提供一個合適的學習環境。你會考慮使用案例式學習方法給你的學生另一種學習經驗嗎? 

參考文獻:

Foran, J. (2001). The case method and the interactive classroom. Thought and Action, 19(1), 41-50.

The Yale Center for Teaching and Learning. (2018). Case-Based Learning. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://ctl.yale.edu/faculty-resources/strategies-teaching/case-based-learning 

Warwick Medical School. (2017). Case Based Learning. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/study/ugr/courseinfo/structure/elements/cbl/ 


Fostering Active Learning with Case-based Learning Approach

What is Case-based Learning?

Case-based learning (CBL) is “an established approach used across disciplines where students apply their knowledge to real-world scenarios, promoting higher-levels of cognition” (The Yale Center for Teaching and Learning). CBL believes that students could draw upon their prior knowledge to make contribution to their learning, which also reflects the constructivism theory that learners learn best when they gain knowledge through exploration and active learning. Therefore this approach is regarded as a student-centred, active learning strategy. In a typical CBL classroom, students would work in groups on case studies, discussing and applying learning to their practice, including critical thinking and problem-solving skills. As facilitators, teachers play a vital role in facilitating the case discussion, overseeing students' learning, encouraging them to be more analytical and assessing their performance.   

What is a Case?  

A case tells a real and engaging story and raises a thought-provoking issue. A case usually has elements of conflict and lacks an obvious or clear-cut right answer. With these features of a case, you may ask, “How can we find a case?” Real-world problems are good sources of cases. They could be local or global news. Student-identified or generated issues could also be used for case-based discussions which students would find them more resonate to them.  

Why CBL?  

CBL has been broadly received for its multiple benefits to students. John Foran (2001), a professor of sociology whose case study teaching has received various awards, shared that the goals of using CBL in his class were to “develop critical thinking skills, learning through decision-making and role-playing situations; develop confidence in defining, confronting, analysing, and solving problems through interactive discussions; and exercising and developing skills in public speaking.” What motivates students and brings them to participate in the discussion in CBL is that most cases are based on realistic problems, and the use of cases in the classroom makes subject matter more relevant.  

How does CBL take place in your classroom? 

Let's look at how CBL could be taken place in a Cultural Studies class, as an example. Teachers could use the controversial news in UK concerning the censorship of a Victorian masterpiece at Manchester Art Gallery as a case for students to discuss the issue of gender and feminism in the visual culture. First, students would work in groups and attempt to discuss the issue using critical thinking. The student-centred discussion allows students to integrate their previous learnt concepts or cross-disciplinary knowledge while exploring the case. The teacher helps facilitate group discussion by asking higher-order thinking questions, such as “why”, “why couldn't”, “how” and “what if”. The teacher should not lecture or dominate the discussion, but encourage active participation by students in their own learning. A good case discussion ties the day's discussion to what has been learnt in previous classes and lays the groundwork for coming lessons.

CBL is a vehicle of engagement for students' participation, and brings an environment whereby students apply their critical thinking to construct knowledge. Would you consider using CBL approach to give your students a vicarious learning experience? 

References:  

Foran, J. (2001). The case method and the interactive classroom. Thought and Action, 19(1), 41-50. 

The Yale Center for Teaching and Learning. (2018). Case-Based Learning. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://ctl.yale.edu/faculty-resources/strategies-teaching/case-based-learning 

Warwick Medical School. (2017). Case Based Learning. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/study/ugr/courseinfo/structure/elements/cbl/